Description of Nighthawks

A Descriptive Essay was written 2005 about a painting:

The painting, Nighthawks (1942), by Edward Hopper, has a still, quiet mood to it. There is a small diner on the street corner; it appears to have an advertisement on the roof. This advertisement has a picture of a cigar right before the word “Phillie’s”. Underneath the cigar, it looks like it says “Only 5 C ”. So I am lead to believe that this is an advertisement for Phillie’s. Either this, or, the name of the diner is Phillie’s, or they serve Phillie’s (cheesesteaks), and the cigar just means cigar smoking is allowed. Being that this picture was painted in the early 40’s, they did not have smoking laws back then and it would be pointless to have a picture of a cigar for purposes other than advertisement, so I’ll go with my first impression.

There is no traffic (human or automotive) outside the diner. The streets are dark and the neighboring buildings are lit only by the bright light being cast from the diner’s long continuous windows. The windows follow the contour of the building’s shape which appears to be triangular, perhaps. The windows are long and wide with no curtains, shades or blinds, so through them, you can see the diner’s content as well as its four occupants.

Inside the diner, there is a pool table green-felt colored ledge around the perimeter of the diner, just below the bottom of those long, wide curvaceous panes of glass. There is a long mahogany-brown bar following the same curvature of the building. It seems very well polished because there is a reflection of the waiter’s shirt. There are also matching mahogany-brown round stools following the base of the bar.

Sitting on one of these stools is a gentleman sitting with his back towards the view depicted by the artist. He is dressed in a dark suit with a hat, presumably drinking a cup of coffee which sits to his right. His posture suggests that he perhaps had a long day and is relaxing with a “cup of Joe” before heading home, or maybe his wife kicked him out and he’s sulking, who knows? Around the other side of the bar is another gentleman but by the view depicted by the artist, his face is revealed. He too is wearing a dark suit and a hat, fashion of the day I guess. Both gentlemen blend with the darkness of the outside behind them. If not for the use of shadows it would appear to be two heads floating around. He too is sitting with a cup of coffee to his right; to his left is a woman with a cup of coffee to her left. The woman, along with the building across the street, which is only lit by the light from the diner, is the only splash of color in this picture. She is wearing a red dress, the same red as the building behind her. Also, she has fiery-red hair. The posture and facial expressions of this couple seem bored, or non-excited. The woman is checking out her nails while the gentleman converses with the waiter.

Behind the bar, you can see the pale yellow color of the walls. Along the back wall are two large coffee makers. They are tall, round, and silver. They have little feet at the bottom and the top is shaped like a Hershey’s kiss. The coffee makers resemble a rocket with a tap. Next to the coffee makers on the right is a tall narrow rectangle of orange with a dark square about a third of the way from the top. Maybe it’s a door. In that case, it is not beside the coffee makers, but behind them, which make the diner seem slightly larger than I originally thought.

In the middle of the diner; in the center of the mahogany-brown bar, stands the waiter. He is wearing a uniform of all white, with a little white hat. He has blond hair and is conversing with the gentleman sitting next to the woman. He is stooped over while he looks up to see the man with whom he is speaking. He may be cleaning a glass, maybe consolidating the napkin holders, salt and pepper shakers, and sugar jars. Or maybe he is just getting in some general cleaning during the slow, dead-of-night period.

The mood of this picture is largely due to the lighting and shading of this picture. It is dark but the brightness introduced by the pale yellow walls invites the eye inside the diner. The woman in red helps to balance the picture from being too heavy with darkness on one side by incorporating the same color of the building into the woman’s dress. Also, from looking at the waiter, the picture goes from white to yellow, to brown, to green, to red and then darkness. The use of contrasting colors helps to outline the focal point of the picture.

The Day Life Became Unclear

This is another Essay from 2005:

A journal entry that was written September 11, 1999, describes a curious dream I had the night before. I don’t normally keep a journal but this dream was so interesting and ominous to me I told my mother and my best friend about it and thought it important enough to write it down. This dream was vivid and real feeling, not at all strange for me but the details of that dream that was still fresh in my mind. I had an office, with my own desk and computer; I was dressed in a suit with pantyhose and high heels. People who I seemed to know but never met before were coming in my office one-by-one and telling me news that I could not believe. What was said by each person I could not recall, but with each person’s periodic report, my heart sank deeper, a sadness swept over me until I awoke saturated in tears. Two years later terrorist brought this dream to reality, destroying an important building to my family’s history, killing so many innocent, hardworking, honest, Americans, and shattering the secure, confident view I had of my future. Life could never be the same.

It was September 11, 2001, when my nightmare became reality. I was working as an accounts manager of an oil company in Chamblee when I felt the unmistakable fog of deja vu. Nine-Thirty that morning, Bob, the chemist, came in and said, “HEY, go online and look at the news; a plane just crashed into the World Trade Center”! My jaw dropped and all I could say to myself was “deja vu”. I figured it must have been a freak accident. How could a passenger plane just crash into a huge skyscraper? Being that my entire family is from Brooklyn, with the exception of my baby cousin and I who are born and raised here in Atlanta, I thought this was quite significant so I called my mother. My mother, from Sheepshead Bay, started her first job at the World Trade Center. She got the position through a temporary agency and worked for many companies within the buildings. She was already on the other line with her high school best friend whom she hadn’t been in contact with in over 10 years making sure she and her family was okay. She knew that her friend worked in one of the buildings. Fortunately, her son was sick and she had to stay home.

I had a lot of work to do so I continued and decided I would hear all about it later. A little while later James, the blender, came in and said, “Can you get the news on that there computer? Two planes crashed into the World Trade Center and another one hit the Pentagon”. My heart sank and I brought up the Associated Press online and saw the pictures; tears ran uncontrollably down my face messing up my make-up. My uncle, who grew up in Coney Island, started his plumbing career as a pipe fitter during the building of the World Trade Center. I called my uncle’s plumbing shop to see if they were watching the news. My cousin quickly told me they were watching it and they were on all the other lines contacting the rest of the family to make sure everyone was okay. Obviously, I was fine so she hung up on me and continued contacting the family.

My mother returned my call and she told me they believed it was a terrorist attack and there were other planes missing. Then the buildings collapsed. For my family, this was devastating. My family essentially “got their start” in those buildings. I’ve never been to New York and have no personal attachments to the buildings other than they looked nice. What really hit me hard where all the people who were in the buildings getting buried alive and those who did not want to be crushed jumped to their deaths from the windows. To top that all off, this was done intentionally. All sense of security and confidence I had toward my future was shattered; I couldn’t in a million years have expected something like this to occur, I also did not know what to expect next, therefore I could not know what to expect in the future.

My life plan had to be altered to include audacities, such as people who have no regard towards human life; would kill themselves and others in “Gods name”, and the people who would celebrate this. So many loved ones, human beings, Americans; so many innocent lives lost, for no good reason. Thank God my family was unharmed. Two towers that hold the background of my family are destroyed and a smoldering ruin lies in the middle of the city that my family called home. Two beautiful landmarks reduced to rubble and human carcasses, a loss of security in my own country, and an indefinite change of plans for my life. Life will never be the same.

America’s Art of Prejudice

This is a Descriptive Essay I wrote for an English Class in 2005:

           To differentiate between two different types of people is to create a preconception about those people. Therefore, discrimination leads to prejudice and prejudice leads to discrimination. Everyone has a prejudice whether it is towards a culture, religion, clothing, color, sex, race, nationality, or food. We are all more partial towards one thing or another. People from Atlanta have a bias towards Coca-Cola while people from the North or the West tend to prefer Pepsi. While many countries have their own particular prejudices, American’s most common form of prejudice tends to be towards people and every type of people at that. The United States of America is the most prejudice country in the world due to racism, nativism, and intolerance. No other country in the world has such a diverse culture; a culture that has turned mere prejudice to hate.

           The “black and white” issue is the most predominate and historic prejudice in our country because of slavery and the long difficult fight for Civil Rights. First, whites believed blacks should be subservient; wait on them hand-and-foot, and tend their fields for free. Then came the Civil War and slavery was abolished, but because the country is run by white men and Lincoln’s purpose was more for revenge towards the south than a humanitarian accomplishment, these “freed slaves” had no money, homes, or jobs. The government did little to enforce the new law and the light at the end of the tunnel just got further away. One hundred years later America is “separate but equal”. A new medium for prejudice is formed: segregation. White people went to white schools; black people went to black schools. White people sat at the front of the bus while black people had to sit in the back. There were “white’s only” water fountains and restaurants that had signs reading “coloreds not allowed”, or if they were “allowed” they had to use the back entrance.

Today, I am not sure if Martin Luther King, Jr. would be proud to see the achievements of his efforts or cry for the anger and hostility southern African Americans have in their heart. Today, the tables have turned. Today, black culture is “Pop” culture, and African Americans are prejudiced against the white people. Racism is a prejudice this country was built upon and may possibly die upon if we keep going through this vicious cycle.

When European and Asian immigrants started to flee to America, native-born inhabitants showed great resentment towards their arrival and generated stereotypes about their cultures. Irish, Italian, and Germans were stigmatized for their drinking. Mexican’s were said to be stealing jobs from the white man, and there was a plain dislike for the Asians. Most 'nativists" were white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestants, like the Ku Klux Klan. Some were immigrants who viewed new immigrants as incapable of assimilation. Mexican Americans did not like new immigration of Mexicans because nativists discriminated against Mexicans and because they looked Mexican they were treated as foreigners. Immigrants were coming in from all sides; Europeans from Ellis Island in the East, Mexicans from Texas and California in the South, and Asians from California in the West. They flooded America’s cities, they could not speak English, had little to no money and no place to live. These immigrants were Catholic, Jewish, or atheist. This did not go over well with the white, Anglo-Saxon, God-fearing Protestants. So America closed the door to immigration. America was built by immigrants, nativists’ parents were immigrants and yet they still discriminated against foreigners. Immigrants were even prejudiced towards their own people.

Finally, intolerance took prejudice in America to another level, to include discrimination against age, sex, and income levels. Women have always been considered the “housewives” in American history. They, similarly to the African Americans, had no rights. Women were not allowed to vote until they proved themselves worthy through their hard work and dedication for their country in World War I. Prejudice towards the sexes created “Male chauvinism” and feminists. An example of prejudice towards age is that people think that teenagers will shoplift, or get mad because there is a baby in the movie theater, even though the baby has been asleep the whole time. Another example would be a slow-moving vehicle must be driven by an elderly person who can’t see over the wheel. They are all preconceived notions generated by prejudice. Rich people are biased against poor people while poor people are biased against rich people, and the middle-class hate both the poor and the rich. The rich are mad because they pay a lot of income tax, and get nothing back while the poor people pay hardly anything and get most of their money back from the government, and are eligible for welfare and food stamp benefits which are financed by the rich people’s taxes. Poor people hate the rich because they have a lot of money and have things that the poor do not have. The middle-class hates the poor because they are eligible for food stamps and the middle-class apparently makes “too much money” to qualify for assistance. They hate the rich because they are rich and have things that the middle-class person works hard for but still can not afford. These income levels create a clash between certain social groups, as well as political groups and thus forms yet another form of prejudice.

As much as I love my country, the ignorance of racism, nativism, and intolerance is just ridiculous. Biologically we are all the same, we are physically different and mentally different on an individual basis but we are still human beings and our differences create diversity and uniqueness. Every person has within them good, bad, and evil. Society teaches us which to use and when. Not all Muslims are terrorists, not all Jews are rich, not all poor white people are trash, not all black people steal, and not all teenagers are shoplifters. These are all stereotypes and nobody likes to be stereotyped. We all like to be known for uniqueness and originality. Prejudice is not fair to society, and it does more harm than good. America has made prejudice an art form.

Total War and the Devastation of the Atomic Bomb: “An Analytical Review of John Hersey’s Hiroshima”

After having visited Hiroshima recently during a study abroad program last May, I absolutely dreaded having to read a book entitled Hiroshima. I had visited the A-Bomb monument and crossed over the Aioi Bridge to the Peace Memorial Park. There were spectacular rose gardens and memorial monuments in all directions. The walk to the Peace Museum was both a humbling and breathtaking experience. While at the Peace Museum, I was able to see first hand, the remnants of the destruction. I saw the “shadow people” imprinted like photo negatives on concrete, pictures of people with their flesh melting off their bones like well-roasted pork, and badly scorched clothing worn by the children working in the fields. The tone, however, was not one of blame or hatred towards Americans; rather, it was one of educating others of the destructive effects of nuclear weapons to ensure that it will never happen again. The phrase repeated was “never again.” The Mayor of Hiroshima took it upon himself to plea to all countries testing nuclear weapons, to learn from the devastation inflicted upon his city. There were walls covered in thousands of letters written by the Mayor. Written almost daily over the course of his lifetime and then continued by his wife, these letters were desperately begging for the cessation of all nuclear testing. These letters are still being written by the current Mayor to this day. John Hersey took his opportunity as a journalist to convey these atrocities to the American public shortly after the bomb had been dropped.

The parents of John Hersey were American missionaries. He was born in Tientsin, China on June 17, 1914, later to graduate from Yale and Cambridge Universities. He took up a career in journalism becoming a correspondent for Time Magazine. He began writing for Life and The New Yorker during World War II and got an opportunity to convoy with the US Military during the offensive on Sicily. In 1945, Hersey received the Nobel Prize for his novel A Bell for Adano which was inspired by his convoy experiences. Hersey also covered stories from the War in the Pacific including how a young Lieutenant John F. Kennedy was able to get his troops back to safety after the PT109 was sunk close to the Solomon Islands, a Japanese munitions island (“John Hersey”).

In 1945, The New Yorker sent Hersey to Hiroshima to report on the aftermath of the first Atomic Bomb. According to Wikipedia, Hersey found a document written by a Jesuit among the rubble and located him. The Jesuit then introduced Hersey to other survivors to interview about their story of survival. When he returned to the United States, The New Yorker dedicated an entire issue to Hersey’s article. He wanted to describe the cost paid for our victory so that the American public could understand the implications of what we had done in order to win/end the war. He did not want Americans to take the use of these types of weapons lightly. This issue of The New Yorker sold like hotcakes and it was read over the radio until eventually being published as a book for all to read. This work is known as the earliest form of New Journalism where the journalist reports their facts in a novel-like format.

Hiroshima is a detailed account of the life and struggle of six survivors of the first Atomic Bomb from the moment it happened to a year later. These survivors included a clerk from the East Asia Tin Works, the doctor of a private hospital, a tailor’s widow, a German priest, a young surgeon, and the Reverend of Hiroshima Methodist Church. It is comprised of four chapters detailing what each person was doing and feeling during the four stages of the devastation caused by the explosion over Hiroshima. Throughout the book, all of these people encountered each other in one way or another.

In August of 1945, the decision was made by President Truman of the United States to end World War II once and for all by dropping the most devastating bomb known to man onto Japan. The US had already developed two of these massively destructive bombs: one for Japan and one for Germany. Germany had already been defeated and the Soviet Union agreed to join in alliance with the US and Brittan. It was clear that Japan was willing to continue fighting until the bitter end. Instead of the risky and costly task of invading Japan, Truman decided to give the Japanese a couple of more chances to surrender. August 6, 1945, at 8:15 am, Japanese time, the Atomic bomb had been delivered over the military and commercial town of Hiroshima. Three days later, their second chance was issued over Nagasaki.

Hersey’s Hiroshima begins with a typical morning for each of the survivors when they noticed a bright white flash. The people of Hiroshima had already been on high alert fearing their city would be next in a series of air raids that had been taking place in several cities all over Japan but never could they have imagined what would befall them in an instant. What seemed like an unusually pleasant and serene morning became a day of unbelievable living hell in a flash. The survivors of this explosion did so purely by the luck of being in a position that shielded them from the most devastating effects of the light or aided them in the survival of radiation, or situational danger.

The first chapter is entitled “The Noiseless Flash.” This chapter gives the entire account of each survivor’s day from the night before or the time they got up until the flash of the bomb. Each survivor was enjoying an unusually quiet morning when they suddenly saw a very bright flash of light. Each of them reacted quickly being that they were already on high alert, only to be thrown by some invisible force. They were trapped beneath beams, riddled with splinters and shards of glass, and buried under rubble. Parents tried desperately to un-trap themselves to get to their children. All were bewildered by what had just happened to them.

The next chapter, “The Fire,” describes what each person saw and did when they were finally able to escape their entrapments. When they made it outside all they could see was destruction in every direction and didn’t know where they should run for safety. Everywhere they looked, they heard people crying for help and water while the obliterated houses began to catch fire. The badly injured laid waiting for assistance from the less injured. The less injured ran around trying to help those who were trapped and injured administering water while apologizing for their lack of injuries. The doctors were already in a hospital where the already ill and injured were now dead and severely injured and thousands more began to flood in with flesh dripping off of their bodies. The doctors found themselves aimlessly treating wounds making their way down corridors of dead and dying people. It was dark outside even though it was still daytime. Everyone found themselves climbing over dead, charred and badly lacerated bodies wondering how it all came to be. Many had the idea that the Americans had sprayed the city with gasoline and set it on fire creating even more panic when gigantic raindrops began to fall from the sky. All who received water began to vomit and most were dead by the next morning. Each of the survivors found themselves in a position where they were unable to drink water for several days after the bombing.

The third Chapter, “Details are being investigated,” discusses each survivor in their individual states and the information they were given from the next morning until the 15^th of August. The morning after the bomb, navy ships set out along Hiroshima’s seven rivers announcing that help was on the way when in fact they were not. Injuries were already infected with puss. The uninjured Pastor was upset that the doctors were paying more attention to the minor injuries than the grave ones. The doctor defended his position by saying that in the most extreme of circumstances it is more important to save the people who will live than to waste resources on the dying. Also on this day, radio broadcasts were emitted about the state of Hiroshima but the only information given was that the “details were being investigated.” By the 8^th, the hospitals found themselves with a puzzling clue when they noticed that all the x-ray plates had been exposed. The second Atomic Bomb was dropped over Nagasaki on the 9^th day but the Japanese government did not distribute the information for a couple of days. There were already rumors about a new type of bomb exponentially more explosive than TNT that involved a complicated matter of splitting atoms. Around the 10^th and the 11^th, the people who worked day and night helping the wounded took a moment to rest and follow up with and locate family members for themselves and others. Hiroshima had established a better state of order around the 12^th day. This chapter ends with the news that the war was over on the 15^th. The Japanese were devastated at the news that they had lost the war but were brought to tears when they heard their beloved Emperor or "Tenno" over the loudspeaker. It was such a great honor that the Emperor himself would personally speak to the people that their broken spirit had been renewed.

The last chapter, “Panic Grass and Feverfew,” discusses why twelve days after the bomb, seemingly healthy survivors began falling extremely week, losing their hair. The white blood count was dropping to dangerously and sometimes fatally low levels. Then, the white blood count began to increase to dangerously and sometimes fatally high levels. This lowered the survival rate substantially. Luckily, Japanese scientists knew quite a bit about nuclear fission and hypothesized that this anomaly was associated with radiation poisoning. They ordered the evacuation of the destruction site to prevent radiation exposure that may have remained after the explosion. They also began to treat this new blood disorder of anemia with vitamin B₁. Luckily the survivors interviewed by Hersey were able to be treated. Once they deemed the area safe a new municipal government had formed to assess the damage and begin restoration efforts. During the recovery effort, the initial death tolls increased by the thousands, as bodies were being excavated from the obliterated and burnt homes. Only relatively new construction was left standing.

During the assessment of the ruins, scientists were able to determine the amount of energy that had been emitted by the bomb, how hot the explosion was and how far the destructive forces reached. Our six survivors moved back to their homes in Hiroshima and began helping in the restoration effort. Children began to resume classes outdoors because they had no classroom. A year after the Atomic Bomb, all of our survivors had found themselves destitute and exhausted. The ethics of the use of the bomb were only really discussed by foreigners because they did not have the same devotion towards the Emperor as the natives. “He who supports total war in principle cannot complain of a war against civilians” (Hersey 90). This is because every Japanese “civilian” is a soldier who’s greatest honor is to defend the Emperor at all cost.

Hiroshima by John Hersey was the hardest book I ever had to read. Even more than books, I have read about the Holocaust. Although the Holocaust hits closer to home historically, the threat of another Atomic Bomb being used is still an extremely real threat to every person on this planet. This book describes the stages of devastation and the misery experienced by the people of Hiroshima. For people unable to visit the Peace Museum, this book is the closest to understanding the horrific effects of nuclear weapons and should be read by all people. It is too easy for people to think that a war could be won with one “super” bomb where everyone dies instantly. It is important for people to know that this is not the case and John Hersey’s book describes the long-term struggle of survival through the lives of these six survivors within the first year of that fateful day. I would like to also add that this book shows the ultimate dedication the Japanese people had for their Emperor. They thought of him as a God and many still do to this day. This creates an extremely dangerous situation. Individually, Japanese people are peaceful and wonderful, but when given a cause with their collective group mentality they can be extremely dangerous and only stoppable by complete eradication. This would explain why such extreme measures were taken to end the war. The US did not want to completely destroy Japan, they wanted them to surrender so that they could rebuild and reestablish their economy and government. The Japanese were being defeated but they would never stop fighting until the Emperor himself was the last man standing.

The Art of Successful Leadership

The Art of War was written by Sun Wu, later to be known by his honorific name of Sun Tzu (544-496 BC). Written near the end of the Spring and Autumn Period (722-481 BC) of ancient China, The Art of War is the oldest military treatise in the world. This paper will use the intellectual approach to show how these simple tactics from ancient times are still relevant to the pursuit of successful leadership in the modern world. General Sun Tzu and his military codes led the King of Wu victoriously through many battles. Over the centuries, The Art of War has influenced many triumphant figures from dictators, generals, and leaders to businessmen and sports coaches. The Art of War is a definitive resource which describes strategic planning, the deployment, and implementation of the plan, and the management of expectations in order to achieve a specific goal. This is the art of successful leadership.

Sun Tzu grew up near the end of the Spring and Autumn Period of Ancient China. This period is marked by substantial political unrest. China was divided into seven states, each fighting to maintain their independence from and supremacy over one another (“Sunzi”). Sun Tzu was a descendant of the Chen clan who were said to be “extremely active and influential in Chinese politics” (Sleevi). His father, Chen Shu, gained the honorable title of “Sun” for his military achievements (Sleevi). Having grown up during this politically turbulent time among a very well respected military family, Sun Tzu was ingrained with the fundamental essence of war. He took his knowledge of military strategy and developed a treatise that outlines a method of gaining psychological control over the opponent to win battles and maintain diplomacy.

The State of Wu was ruled by the Zhou dynasty. Olivia Milburn wrote about how the line of descent during the Zhou dynasty seemed to be “repeatedly disrupted” for an array of complicated reasons (195). For these complicated reasons, the decedents of King Liao were not in line to succeed him, instead, the sons of the former king of Wu, King Zhufan, were. One of these sons, Prince Guang, believed that he was the rightful heir to the throne. In 515 BC, Prince Guang invited King Liao to a banquette where he ordered a warrior named Zhuan Zhu to assassinate him. Prince Guang named himself King Helü of Wu (206-209). According to the Cultural China website, the goal of King Helü (also noted as Helv) was to revitalize and strengthen the State of Wu by the fortification of the political, economic, and military power (“King of Wu-Helv”).

As an admirer of The Art of War, King Helü appointed Sun Wu as general of his army. In 506 BC Sun Tzu’s strategy helped the State of Wu defeat the State of Chu. “The success was an unprecedented case of capturing the capital of a big state during the Spring and Autumn Period” (“King of Wu-Helv”). In 505 BC the State of Wu came under attack of the State of Yue but they were no match for the Wu army. A year later, they attacked the State of Chu again, forcing the relocation of their capital. All was well in the State of Wu until they decided to attack the State of Yue in 496 BC. It was during this battle that King Helü of Wu met his demise, dying from the wounds inflicted upon him in battle (“King of Wu-Helv”). It is assumed but not confirmed that Sun Tzu died in this battle as well. There are no further written accounts of Sun Tzu after this time.

The Warring States Period began in 475 BC and ended in 221 BC when Qin Shihuangdi, following the strategies of The Art of War, conquered all of the Chinese States unifying them and becoming the First Emperor of China. In 760 CE The Art of War was introduced to Japan where it became somewhat of a code of ethics for the Samurai and Shoguns, aiding in the unification of Japan. It is said to have also had an influence on many well known leaders including Napoleon (this is not documented, but it is well known that he was an avid reader and student of military tactics and would be hard to believe that he had not encountered it), Ho Chi Minh, Mao Tse-Tung, Tokugawa, Che Guevara, along with countless others.

The Art of War did not reach the western hemisphere until the 19^th century. Not only was in embraced by the military, especially in the U.S. but quickly became a useful tool in western business and civilization by the 20^th Century. The Art of War has found practical application in almost everything in western society from business management to handling people in a diplomatic and civilized manner. It seems strange that a military treatise would be useful in these areas but the competitiveness of the western world from business to everyday life requires adequate strategy and technique in order to stand out and be recognized. As a society, especially in America, we have been told time and time again to be a leader, not a follower.

The Art of War is an easy to follow guide to successful leadership in any situation. It contains thirteen chapters of pithy fundamental laws of warfare. Victory and the success of the army is directly associated with the skill of the general to properly assess the situation at hand and formulate a plan, implement that plan in an efficient and strategic manner, and then seal the deal with diplomatic care. It is not so strange that these ideas can be applied to everyday life because we are a society of leaders and followers. Just like an army is led by a general, children are led by a parent, a group has a group leader, a club has a president, a corporation has a CEO, a team has a coach, and even social cliques have a dominant member. Western society is designed for all of us to move from the lower position to one with more leadership responsibilities. It is this drive and the need for successful leadership that has made The Art of War such a useful tool in modern society.

The first (and most important) step involves strategic planning. Sun Tzu emphasizes this point by speaking directly to the reader. By assessing the situation and the people involved you will know exactly who your opponent is and the environment and conditions with which you will be working. Once you have learned all you can about your opponent and the conditions that you will be faced with, you can begin to formulate a plan. A successful plan is formed with a very clear goal in mind. You must know exactly what it is that you wish to accomplish in order to prepare a winning game plan. Otherwise, it will be impossible to accurately calculate your resources and know exactly where they need to be implemented.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle” (Giles 17). In order to have a superior offensive stance, you must know your enemy. In order to have a superior defensive stance, you must know yourself. You must be superior on the offensive as well as defensive in order to prevail. When asking for a raise or a promotion, not only do you need to be confident in your own abilities to do the job, you must know exactly what it is that your boss and company are seeking to fill the requirements.

Many people do not consider important factors of why they will not advance in their career. If you are the only mechanic you should not expect to be promoted to management no matter how many good ideas you have or how confident you are about the position. It is just not feasible for the company to train a new mechanic when they can hire a stranger with management expertise. This is a case of knowing yourself but not your opponent. To know yourself and your opponent, you will have more options. If you know you have the ability to excel in management and that is your ultimate goal, you will devise a plan to seek employment with a company with advancement opportunities. If you know you are content in your current position and you know that you are the only generator of income, you have the leverage to request a raise.

The next step is the implementation of the plan. During this phase, not only should you engage your well thought out plan, it is essential to benchmark your progress. You must execute your resources while maintaining a scheduled skill base. The most significant resources include time and money. The ability to preserve these resources requires the skill of making a series of strategic strikes. A plan must be versatile because conditions are constantly changing. A successful leader is aware of and allows for these unforeseen events. Periodically, it is necessary to assess the efficiency of deployment at certain intervals to ensure success. These evaluations of progress allow revisions to be made to the initial plan based on any changes in conditions or expectations, or in the event of a failed, or doomed to fail, mission.

“The general who thoroughly understands the advantages that accompany variation of tactics knows how to handle his troops” (Giles 35). “Accordingly as circumstances are favorable, one should modify one’s plans” (8). The leader who expects the unexpected will be prepared to face any change in condition and make the appropriate modifications to his plan to accommodate these changes. Master Sun advises: “In war…let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns.” “Thus, it may be known that the leader of armies is the arbiter of the people’s fate, the man on whom it depends whether the nation shall be in peace or in peril” (13).

President Obama entered his presidency with an enormous task of stabilizing this country and the world economy. He quickly formulated a plan to revive the economy as well as restore faith in U.S. currency. The execution of his plan so far has involved the issuance of bailout funds to bankruptcy-bound American automakers and banks in order to avert a series of catastrophic events by using his executive privilege. In order to correct the spiraling downward trend of the unemployment rate, Obama is implementing a plan to issue a stimulus to the states in order to encourage employment and protect infrastructure. The President uses the stock market and the job index as indicators of his progress. By watching these numbers he is able to evaluate his progress and hopefully make the appropriate changes in order to obtain his goal. Now, General Motors is still facing bankruptcy and the catastrophic events Obama was trying to avoid are still a real threat. At this point, Obama has pledged his support to guide General Motors through the bankruptcy process to ease the pain of the people who will suffer as a result.

Once your plan has been fully executed, even if successful, leadership cannot be achieved or maintained until you have managed the expectations of yourself and others, and have quickly established a state of normalcy. This requires a diplomatic takeover. It is imperative to destroy your opponent while squashing dissent. By destroying your opponent you eliminate any chance of retaliation as well as their allegiances that could rebel against you. You must retain social order amongst these allegiances by giving them incentives to become devoted to your guidance and minimize opposition.

“In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to capture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them” (Giles 15). “The captured soldiers should be kindly treated and kept” (13). Once you have been successful in your take-over, it is practical to not destroy the infrastructure or eliminate the people who know how to run it. In order to eliminate dissent of the people, you must treat them in a fair and humane manner and use them to augment your own army. Master Sun says, “The general that hearkens to my counsel and acts upon it, will conquer:-let such a one be retained in command! The general that hearken not to my counsel nor acts upon it will suffer defeat:-let such a one be dismissed!” (Giles 8).

The merger of two corporations must be handled in a delicate manner. The first order of business is to vacate all top management positions, thus, eliminating the opponent. In order to maintain social order and manage dissent among the workers, the old president or CEO should be temporarily retained in a non-decision-making position and eventually phased out. The next step involves the maintenance of newly acquired debt while seamlessly combining resources. The easiest way to cut costs is to fire employees. Again, you must manage dissent by offering an acceptable severance package. Finally, it is important to continually benchmark progress. Once the merger is complete and a good amount of debt has been extinguished, it is time to begin increasing profit margins. This is an example of a triumphant take over through successful leadership.

Since the 20^th Century, authors have associated the principals of The Art of War to every aspect imaginable, from the obvious subjects of military strategy, and leadership in business, to Health Care Management, and internet security. The concept is so basic that it has found its way into the hands of many who wish to excel. The words used in the text are not as important as their connotations and it is these connotations that give the text its versatility.

In the article, “Business lessons from military strategy,” Hans Widmer discusses the reasons why many businesses, though superior in many important areas, fail to beat their competition. The military follows a set of finite rules to ensure the defeat of the opponent. Businesses, however, tend to interpret these rules more loosely and are content with maintaining the status quo (Widmer 60). Companies can continue to run, although not as efficiently as possible, even if they are not number one. If the military losses, they lose more then ranking, they lose human lives, resources, and face.

The first step of creating a plan begins with a very clearly defined goal in order to make the proper calculations to obtain that goal. There are many factors that determine the success of a business. It is important for a business to have a competitive edge in order to “define clearly the arena in which the company chooses to compete.” It is this lack of definition, Widmer says, hinders the ability to “articulate” a specific goal (Widmer 61). Without defining a competitive edge or a goal it is impossible to know who your target audience is and how you should market your product. If you cannot define your target audience you cannot effectively deploy your resources. Therefore, the designation of a clear and precise goal is the most important step to successful leadership.

The deployment stage of the plan should employ the shaping of the competition. Deception is a key concept in order to control the opponent. Knowing your opponent is essential to have the tools of deception. You must make the opponent believe one thing while you do another, either leading them into a vulnerable situation or allowing them to show their weak spots. “Shaping has both offensive and defensive characteristics” (Sleevi). A company should quietly work on innovations (defensive) while manipulating their opponent and waiting for a weak spot to penetrate (offensive). Once a weak spot is exposed, it must be attacked swiftly and with a lot of force. Steven Heine, from Florida International University, deduced from his readings that there are two main requirements for becoming a successful leader; internal and external skill (Heine 132). This is yet another suggestion of how important it is to be skilled in both the defensive and offensive.

The success of each step is dependent on the quality of the execution of the step before it. Every step should flow like water; following the path of least resistance. In order to be a successful leader, one must be ready to defend an attack while waiting for the opportunity to attack, and most of all, one must have a clear, well-defined goal.

There have been many books and articles written about the correlation between war and western business. The concepts found in The Art of War have become second nature in the business world only because it has been implemented in the training process of every competitive field. If you read any training manual from Project Management to Information Technology, you will find that they all follow the same premise; formulate a plan, execute that plan, and clean up any loose ends. Even though the outline is cut and dry, the skill and attention to the deeper concepts is what sets the industry leader apart from the rest. The Art of War offers a more detailed reasoning behind the concepts, showing the importance of proper application and timing, hence, it is a guide to honing one’s skill in the art of leadership.

The fact of the matter is that in this day and age, every interaction we encounter is a battle whether it is handling a business or personal transaction. Our current economic crisis is a battle we are all faced with. Even the simplest task of grocery shopping can be assisted with the principles of The Art of War.

First, a budget is made (plan). Calculations are required to determine what items are needed and in what quantity (goal), how much money is available for these items (resources), where these items can be found at the best prices (where to implement the resources), and which mode of transportation is most cost-effective (how to implement resources). Then, the needs must be obtained (deployment of the plan). Money (resources) must be tracked from item to item and from store to store by frequent references to the checkbook (benchmarking progress). Modifications of the original plan must be made if the price of an item has unexpectedly increased or is out of stock. Then the items must be purchased for the correct amount, and every item must make it home. Then the items must last for the intended period of time (managing the expectations of yourself and others). In the case of a resource running low before expected, such as milk or juice, it should be augmented with water while the family is not looking (quickly establish normalcy). This is the art of successful lifestyle leadership.

Works Cited

Giles, Lionel, trans. The Art of War. By Sun Tzu. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2003.

Heine, Steven. "From Art of War to Attila the Hun: A Critical Survey of Recent Works on Philosophy/Spirituality and Business Leadership." 126-143. University of Hawaii Press, 2008. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Georgia Perimeter College Library, Clarkston, GA. 22 Apr. 2009.

“King of Wu-Helv.” Cultural China. 5 Apr. 2009 <>.

Milburn, Olivia. "Kingship and Inheritance in the State of Wu: Fraternal Succession in Spring and Autumn Period China (771-475 BC)." T'oung Pao 90.4 (Dec. 2004): 195-214. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Georgia Perimeter College Library, Clarkston, GA. 5 Apr. 2009.

Sleevi, Nola M. “Applying the principals of war.” Military Review 78.3 (May 1998): 47. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. EBSCO. Georgia Perimeter College Library, Clarkston, GA. 5 Apr. 2009.

"Sunzi." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 6 Apr. 2009 .

Widmer, Hans. “Business lessons from military strategy.” Mckinsey Quarterly (Spring08 1980): 59-67. Business Source Complete. EBSCO. Georgia Perimeter Library, Clarkston, GA. 5 Apr. 2009.